February 22, 2006
Jiim Geraghty has some background on how the conservative blogosphere got scammed
So it looks like the AP and Chuck Shumer floated some very misleading comments around, and some big-time bloggers took the bait.
The controversy over this port sale have been driven by a great deal of vague, ominous and sloppy language thrown around by lawmakers, the media and bloggers. Had this discussion been marked by precision and a focus on just what was at stake, this would not have turned into the brouhaha it did. One almost wonders if the misleading language was deliberate.
Declaring that the UAE “has financial links to the 9/11 hijackers” makes it sound like the country’s government itself backed the attacks instead of some of its citizens; if that were the case, we would have invaded them.
Just what does it take for a country to have, as a New York Post editorial put it, “ties to the Sept. 11 hijackers?” The editorial observes that the country’s “banking system - considered the commercial center of the Arab world - provided most of the cash for the 9/11 hijackers.” Terrorists look to financing in Dubai for the same reason Billy the Kid robbed banks; that’s where the money is. I’m sure terror financing runs through Dubai; financing for just about every economic activity in the region runs through Dubai.
“Much of the operational planning for the World Trade Center attacks took place inside the UAE.” Well, the Hamburg cell planned a lot in Germany. Are we to distrust German companies? Does this fact outweigh the fact that our military leaders credit the UAE for cooperation and help in the war on terror, and call them “very, very solid partners”? Do we suspect that Donald Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Peter Pace are lying, and putting American lives at risk because they really want to see this deal go through?
Here's a WashPo rundown on the development of the story.
I myself would fault President Bush for many failings, but lax interest in security is not one of them. When I saw reports that Bush had "sold our nations ports to the Arabs," implying, of course, "Arab terrorists", my first reaction was, "that can't be correct." The news these days is absolutely full of misleading BS, so why believe this?
The more you look at this story the less there is there. We'll get hammered in the Muslim press, of course, only this time we'll deserve it.
Technorati Tags: Ports
Posted by Jay on February 22, 2006 at 05:03 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jiim Geraghty has some background on how the conservative blogosphere got scammed:
» American Port Security part 4 from Cardinal Martini: A USC Trojan's Weblog
Jim Geraghty at TKS (at National Review) writes, My fellow bloggers… we’ve been snookered. [snip] The controversy over this port sale have been driven by a great deal of vague, ominous and sloppy language thrown around by lawmakers, the media... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 22, 2006 9:23:40 PM
Just wanted to say a big huge CONGRATS on the book! I look forward to reading it, and I love your blog and your column. Can't wait for the new blog
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | May 18, 2009 11:29:40 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.